Attitudes on Artificial Intelligence use in Pediatric Care From Parents of Hospitalized Children.

INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) may benefit pediatric healthcare, but it also raises ethical and pragmatic questions. Parental support is important for the advancement of AI in pediatric medicine. However, there is little literature describing parental attitudes toward AI in pediatric healthcare, and existing studies do not represent parents of hospitalized children well. METHODS: We administered the Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Healthcare, a validated survey, to parents of hospitalized children in a single tertiary children's hospital. Surveys were administered by trained study personnel (11/2/2021-5/1/2022). Demographic data were collected. An Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Healthcare score, assessing openness toward AI-assisted medicine, was calculated for seven areas of concern. Subgroup analyses were conducted using Mann-Whitney U tests to assess the effect of race, gender, education, insurance, length of stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission on AI use. RESULTS: We approached 90 parents and conducted 76 surveys for a response rate of 84%. Overall, parents were open to the use of AI in pediatric medicine. Social justice, convenience, privacy, and shared decision-making were important concerns. Parents of children admitted to an ICU expressed the most significantly different attitudes compared to parents of children not admitted to an ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Parents were overall supportive of AI-assisted healthcare decision-making. In particular, parents of children admitted to ICU have significantly different attitudes, and further study is needed to characterize these differences. Parents value transparency and disclosure pathways should be developed to support this expectation.

Complication rates in very low and extremely low birth weight infants following laparotomy: a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site occurrences (SSO), including surgical site infection, dehiscence, and incisional hernia, are complications following laparotomy. SSO rates in premature neonates are poorly understood. We hypothesize that SSO rates are higher among extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants compared to very low birth weight (VLBW) infants and strive to determine the optimal abdominal closure method for these infants. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of infants < 1.5 kg (kg) undergoing laparotomy at two institutions from 1/1/2020 to 5/1/2022. Patients were grouped by weight and closure; SSO rates were computed and the association tested using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: We identified 59 patients and 104 total operations. At initial surgery, 37 patients weighed < 1 kg (ELBW); 22 patients weighed 1-1.5 kg (VLBW). Complication rate for ELBW was 6(16%) vs. 2(9%) in VLBW, but not significant (p = 0.45). More complications followed a single-layer compared to a two-layer closure (18 vs. 2), but not significant (p = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: SSO rates are higher for ELBW infants undergoing laparotomy, and fewer complications follow two-layer closure. However, these findings did not reach statistical significance. Further studies are needed to identify modifiable factors to reduce postoperative complications in these infants.

Body Mass Index Is Associated With Pediatric Complicated Appendicitis and Postoperative Complications.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) spectrum and complicated appendicitis and postoperative complications in pediatric patients. BACKGROUND: Despite the impact of being overweight and obese on complicated appendicitis and postoperative complications, the implications of being underweight are unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients was conducted using NSQIP (2016-2020) data. Patient's BMI percentiles were categorized into underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese. The 30-day postoperative complications were grouped into minor, major, and any. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were performed. RESULTS: Among 23,153 patients, the odds of complicated appendicitis were 66% higher in underweight patients [odds ratio (OR)=1.66; 95% CI: 1.06-2.59] and 28% lower in overweight patients (OR=0.72; 95% CI: 0.54-0.95) than normal-weight patients. A statistically significant interaction between overweight and preoperative white blood cells (WBCs) increased the odds of complicated appendicitis (OR=1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.03). Compared to normal-weight patients, obese patients had 52% higher odds of minor (OR=1.52; 95% CI: 1.18-1.96) and underweight patients had 3 times the odds of major (OR=2.77; 95% CI: 1.22-6.27) and any (OR=2.82; 95% CI: 1.31-6.10) complications. A statistically significant interaction between underweight and preoperative WBC lowered the odds of major (OR=0.94; 95% CI: 0.89-0.99) and any complications (OR=0.94; 95% CI: 0.89-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Underweight, overweight, and interaction between overweight and preoperative WBC were associated with complicated appendicitis. Obesity, underweight, and interaction between underweight and preoperative WBC were associated with minor, major, and any complications. Thus, personalized clinical pathways and parental education targeting at-risk patients can minimize postoperative complications.

Healthcare Utilization Among Infants Discharged From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Descriptive Cost Analysis.

The cost of readmissions of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) graduates within 6 months and a year of their life is well-studied. However, the cost of readmissions within 90 days of NICU discharge is unknown. This study's objective was to estimate the overall and mean cost of healthcare use for unplanned hospital visits of NICU graduates within 90 days of discharge A retrospective review of all infants discharged between 1/1/2017 and 03/31/2017 from a large hospital system NICUs was conducted. All unplanned hospital visits (readmissions or stand-alone emergency department (ED) visits) occurring within 90 days post NICU discharge were included. The total and mean cost of unplanned hospital visits were computed and adjusted to 2021 US dollars. The total cost was estimated to be $785 804 with a mean of $1898 per patient. Hospital readmissions accounted for 98% ($768 718) of the total costs and ED visits for 2% ($17 086). The mean cost per readmission and stand-alone ED visit were $25 624 and $475 respectively. The highest mean total cost of unplanned hospital readmission was noted in extremely low birth weight infants ($25 295). Interventions targeted to reduce hospital readmissions after NICU discharge have the potential to significantly reduce healthcare costs for this patient population.

Impact of Cryoanalgesia Use During Minimally Invasive Pectus Excavatum Repair on Hospital Days and Total Hospital Costs Among Pediatric Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical repair of pectus excavatum is a painful procedure requiring multimodal pain control with historically prolonged hospital stay. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of cryoanalgesia during minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) on hospital days (HDs), total hospital costs (HCs), and complications. We hypothesized that cryoanalgesia would be associated with reduced HDs and total HCs with no increase in post-operative complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent MIRPE from 2011 to 2021. MIRPE details and post-operative outcomes within 90 days were abstracted. Total HDs included the index MIRPE admission and readmissions within 90 days. HCs were obtained from the hospital accounting system, retroactively adjusting for medical inflation. Bayesian generalized linear models with neutral prior assuming no effect were used. Differences between treatment groups were assessed using gamma distribution (HDs and HCs) and poisson (post-operative complications). All models used log link and controlled for age, gender, race, and Haller index. RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent MIRPE during the study period. Cryoanalgesia was utilized in 29 (66%) patients. The probability of a reduction with cryoanalgesia vs. no cryoanalgesia was 99% for HDs (3.0 vs. 5.4 days; Bayesian RR: 0.6, 95% CrI: 0.5-0.8), 89% for HCs ($18,787 vs. $19,667; RR: 0.9, 95% CrI: 0.8-1.1), and 70% for postoperative complications (17% vs 33%; RR: 0.8, 95% CrI: 0.3-1.9). CONCLUSION: Cryoanalgesia use in MIRPE likely reduced HDs, HCs, and post-operative complications. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings in large prospective studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Estimated prevalence of facial injury-related mortality in the United States pediatric population.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In pediatric populations, the epidemiology of facial trauma, their injury patterns, distribution, and outcomes are well known, However, little is known about the risk factors and impacts of minor and moderate facial injuries on in-hospital mortality among children in the United States of America (USA). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for in-hospital mortality among pediatric patients following facial injuries in the USA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with data from the National Trauma Data Bank's pediatric hospitalized patients (<18 years) with facial injuries (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 802.00 to 802.9 and Tenth Revision codes S02.2 to S02.92) between January 01, 2016-December 31, 2019. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to identify the risk factors for in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 61,294 pediatric patients (mean age 11.9 years, 69.6% males) were included in the analysis. The estimated prevalence of in-hospital mortality following facial injuries was 2.4% (n = 1480). In terms of mortality, compared to those who sustained minor facial injuries, patients with (1) moderate injuries had 43% higher odds (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.25-1.64, p < .0001), (2) serious injuries had seven times higher odds (OR = 7.81; 95% CI: 6.67-9.14, p < .0001), (3) severe injuries had 16 times higher odds (OR = 16.07; 95% CI: 12.62-20.46, p < .0001), and (4) critical/maximum injury virtually unsurvivable had 145 times higher odds (OR = 145.24; 95% CI: 113.82-185.33, p < .0001) of death after controlling for age, race, insurance status, comorbidities, and hospital complications. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of facial injury, age 5-17 years, uninsured status, and those with a mental/personality disorder were risk factors for in-hospital mortality among pediatric patients following facial injuries in this population-level analysis. A better understanding of these risk factors is needed for clinical management of pediatric patients to prevent in-hospital mortality following facial injuries.

Pertussis and influenza immunization: perceived attitude and decision of postpartum patients.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination of pregnant patients with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza vaccine during influenza season can reduce maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality; nevertheless, vaccination rates remain suboptimal in this patient population. To investigate the effect of a brief educational counseling session on maternal Tdap and influenza vaccination and determine factors influencing women's decision in regards to receiving Tdap and or influenza vaccine during their pregnancy. METHODS: A face-to-face semi-structured cross-sectional survey was administered to postpartum patients on their anticipated day of discharge (June 11-August 21, 2018). A brief educational counseling session about maternal pertussis and Tdap vaccine was provided to interested patients after which the Tdap vaccine was offered to eligible patients who did not receive it during their pregnancy or upon hospital admission. Medical records were reviewed to determine if surveyed patients were vaccinated prior to discharge. RESULTS: Two hundred postpartum patients were surveyed on their day of anticipated discharge. Of those who were surveyed, 103 (51.5%) had received Tdap and 80 (40.0%) had received influenza vaccinations prior to hospitalization. Among immunized patients, the common facilitators were doctor's recommendation (Tdap: 68, 54.4%; influenza: 3, 6.0%), to protect their baby (Tdap: 57, 45.6%; influenza: 17, 34.0%) and for self-protection (Tdap: 17, 13.6%; Influenza: 17, 34.0%). Of the 119 participants who had not received either Tdap or influenza vaccine prior to the survey, the barriers cited were that the vaccine was not offered by the provider (Tdap: 36, 52.2%; influenza: 29, 27.6%), belief that vaccination was unnecessary (Tdap: 5, 7.2%; influenza: 9, 8.5%), safety concerns for baby (Tdap: 4, 5.8%; influenza: 2, 1.9%). Of 97 patients who were not immunized with Tdap prior to admission but were eligible to receive vaccine, 24 (25%) were vaccinated prior to survey as part of routine hospital-based screening and vaccination program, 29 (38.2%) after our survey. CONCLUSION: Interventions to educate pregnant patients about the benefits of vaccination for their baby, addressing patient safety concerns, and vaccine administration in obstetricians' offices may significantly improve maternal vaccination rates.

Standardization of Pediatric Noncardiac Operating Room to Intensive Care Unit Handoffs Improves Communication and Patient Care.

OBJECTIVES: Handoffs are critical points in transitioning care between multidisciplinary teams, yet data regarding intensive care unit (ICU) handoffs in pediatric noncardiac surgical patients are lacking. We hypothesized that standardized handoffs from the pediatric operating room (OR) to the ICU would improve physician presence, communication, and patient care parameters. METHODS: This quality improvement initiative was performed at a tertiary children's hospital. Stakeholders (anesthesiologists, nurses, intensivists, and surgeons) developed a standardized OR to pediatric and neonatal ICU handoff process based on common goals and outcomes of interest. Baseline data were collected before intervention. Implementation was carried out in 2 phases, phase 1 with a written handoff and Phase 2 with a scripted handoff process. Data collected by trained observers included handoff attendance, distractions, and transfer of essential patient information. As a surrogate for outcomes, patient care parameter data were collected for 6 hours after transfer. RESULTS: After phase 1, surgery and ICU physician attendance increased significantly, distractions decreased, and communication of essential patient data improved. In phase 2 (scripted handoff), attendance continued to rise, distractions remained decreased, and transfer of essential information was still improved compared with baseline. Mean handoff duration did not significantly change throughout the study. Certain patient care parameters (escalation of respiratory support, additional laboratory studies, vasopressor administration, antibiotic administration and timing) remained unchanged compared with baseline. However, the need for resuscitative fluid bolus or blood products significantly decreased after implementation phase 2. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized handoffs for pediatric noncardiac surgical patients from the OR to the ICU can improve provider attendance and communication.

Development of a Quality Improvement Dental Chart Review Training Program.

INTRODUCTION: Chart review is central to understanding adverse events (AEs) in medicine. In this article, we describe the process and results of educating chart reviewers assigned to evaluate dental AEs. METHODS: We developed a Web-based training program, "Dental Patient Safety Training," which uses both independent and consensus-based curricula, for identifying AEs recorded in electronic health records in the dental setting. Training included (1) didactic education, (2) skills training using videos and guided walkthroughs, (3) quizzes with feedback, and (4) hands-on learning exercises. In addition, novice reviewers were coached weekly during consensus review discussions. TeamExpert was composed of 2 experienced reviewers, and TeamNovice included 2 chart reviewers in training. McNemar test, interrater reliability, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated to compare accuracy rates on the identification of charts containing AEs at the start of training and 7 months after consensus building discussions between the 2 teams. RESULTS: TeamNovice completed independent and consensus development training. Initial chart reviews were conducted on a shared set of charts (n = 51) followed by additional training including consensus building discussions. There was a marked improvement in overall percent agreement, prevalence and bias-adjusted κ correlation, and diagnostic measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) of reviewed charts between both teams from the phase I training program to phase II consensus building. CONCLUSIONS: This study detailed the process of training new chart reviewers and evaluating their performance. Our results suggest that standardized training and continuous coaching improves calibration between experts and trained chart reviewers.

Variability in opioid prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs: A survey of providers caring for pediatric surgical patients.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Comprehensive opioid stewardship programs require collective stakeholder alignment and proficiency. We aimed to determine opioid-related prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs among providers who care for pediatric surgical patients. METHODS: A single-center, cross-sectional survey was conducted of attending physicians, residents, and advanced practice providers (APPs), who managed pediatric surgical patients. RESULTS: Of 110 providers surveyed, 75% completed the survey. Over half of respondents (n = 43, 52%) reported always/very often prescribing opioids at discharge, with residents reporting the highest rate (66%). Provider types had varying prescribing patterns, including what types of opioids and non-opioids they prescribed. There was a lack of formal training, particularly among residents, of which only 42% reported receiving formal opioid prescribing education. Finally, although only 28% of providers felt that the opioid epidemic affects children, 48% believed pediatric providers' prescribing patterns contributed to the opioid epidemic as a whole, and 80% reported changing their prescribing practices in response. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variability exists in opioid prescribing practices, knowledge, and beliefs among providers who care for pediatric surgical patients. Effective opioid stewardship requires comprehensive policies, pediatric specific guidelines, and education for all providers caring for children to align provider proficiency and optimize prescribing patterns.

Early discharge after nonoperative management of intussusception is both safe and cost-effective.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: We implemented a quality improvement (QI) initiative to safely reduce post-reduction monitoring for pediatric patients with ileocolic intussusception. We hypothesized that there would be decreased length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs, with no change in intussusception recurrence rates. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of pediatric ileocolic intussusception patients who underwent successful enema reduction at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital from January 2015 through June 2020. In September 2017, an intussusception management protocol was implemented, which allowed discharge within four hours of reduction. Pre- and post-QI outcomes were compared for index encounters and any additional encounter beginning within 24 h of discharge. An economic evaluation was performed with hospital costs inflation-adjusted to 2020 United States Dollars ($). Cost differences between groups were assessed using multivariable regression, adjusting for Medicaid and transfer status, P < 0.05 significant. RESULTS: Of 90 patients, 37(41%) were pre-QI and 53(59%) were post-QI. Patients were similar by age, sex, race, insurance status, and transfer status. Pre-QI patients had a median LOS of 23.4 h (IQR: 16.1-34.6) versus 9.3 h (IQR 7.4-14.2) for post-QI patients, P < 0.001. Mean total costs per patient in the pre-QI group were $3,231 (95% CI, $2,442-$4,020) versus $1,861 (95% CI, $1,481-$2,240) in the post-QI group. The mean absolute cost difference was $1,370 less per patient in the post-QI group (95% CI, [-$2,251]-[-$490]). Five patients had an additional encounter within 24 h of discharge [pre-QI: 1 (3%) versus post-QI: 4 (8%), p = 0.7] with four having intussusception recurrence [pre-QI: 1 (3%) versus post-QI: 3 (6%), p = 0.6]. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a quality improvement initiative for the treatment of pediatric intussusception reduced hospital length of stay and costs without negatively affecting post-discharge encounters or recurrence rates. Similar protocols can easily be adopted at other institutions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative treatment study.

Cryoanalgesia is Associated With Decreased Postoperative Opioid Use in Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain control is challenging after pectus excavatum repair. We aimed to understand the impact that cryoanalgesia had on opioid utilization and outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients (< 18 y) who underwent MIRPE (2011-2019). Patients receiving cryoanalgesia were compared to those who did not. The primary outcome was total postoperative, inpatient, opioid use, measured as milligrams of oral morphine equivalents per kilogram (OME/kg). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 35 patients, 20 received cryoanalgesia (57%). Baseline characteristics were similar. Patients who received cryoanalgesia had a lower opioid requirement: median 2.3 mg OME/kg (IQR 1.2-3.1), versus 4.9 mg OME/kg (IQR 2.9-5.8), P < 0.001. Accounting for receipt of cryoanalgesia, epidural, and/or patient-controlled analgesia, cryoanalgesia was associated with a 3.3 mg OME/kg reduction in opioid use (P < 0.001). Median length of stay (LOS) was shorter in cryoanalgesia patients: 3.1 d (IQR 2.3-3.4), versus 5.1 d (IQR 4.3-5.4), P < 0.001. Complications within 90 d were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cryoanalgesia is an effective adjunctive pain control modality for patients undergoing MIRPE. Use of cryoanalgesia was associated with lower postoperative opioid requirements and shorter LOS, without increased short-term complications, and should be considered for enhanced recovery after MIRPE.

Barriers to Transition to Home From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Perspectives of Parents and Healthcare Providers.

The objective of this study was to explore the challenges faced by parents of former neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients in transitioning home from parents' and healthcare providers' perspective. We conducted semistructured individual and group interviews with parents of former NICU patients and healthcare providers. Themes from the individual interviews framed the group interviews' contents. The group interviews were recorded and transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed to identify themes. We conducted individual and group interviews with 16 parents and 33 inpatient and outpatient providers from November 2017 to June 2018. Individual interview participants identified several barriers experienced by parents when transitioning their infant home from the NICU including parental involvement and engagement during NICU stay and during the discharge process. Further exploration within group interviews revealed opportunities to improve discharge communication and processes, standardization of parental education that was lacking due to NICU resource constraints, support for parents' emotional state, and use of technology for infant care in the home. Parents of NICU patients face serious emotional, logistical, and knowledge challenges when transitioning their infant home from the NICU. Understanding and mitigating the challenges of transitioning infants from NICU to home require multistakeholder input from both parents and providers.

Variation in opioid utilization among neonates with gastroschisis.

PURPOSE: Repetitive painful stimuli and early exposure to opioids places neonates at risk for neurocognitive delays. We aimed to understand opioid utilization for neonates with gastroschisis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of infants with gastroschisis at a tertiary children's hospital (2017-2019). Multivariate linear regression was performed to analyze variations in opioid use. RESULTS: Among 30 patients with gastroschisis, 33% were managed by primary suture-less closure, 7% by primary sutured closure, 40% by spring silo, and 20% by handsewn silo. The proportion of pain medication used was: morphine (89%), acetaminophen (8%), and fentanyl (3%). Opioids were used for a median of 6.5 days (range 0-20) per patient. Median total opioid administered across all patients was 2.2 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/kg (IQR 0.7-3.3). Following definitive closure, median opioid use was 0.2 MME/kg (IQR 0.1-0.8). With multivariate regression, 45% of the variation in MME use was associated with the type of surgery after adjusting for weight, gestational age, and gender, p = 0.02. After definitive fascial closure, there was no significant variations in opioid use. CONCLUSION: There is a significant variation in the utilization of opioid, primarily prior to fascial closure. Understanding pain needs and standardization may improve opioid stewardship in infants with gastroschisis. 197/200 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Classifying Adverse Events in the Dental Office.

BACKGROUND: Dentists strive to provide safe and effective oral healthcare. However, some patients may encounter an adverse event (AE) defined as "unnecessary harm due to dental treatment." In this research, we propose and evaluate two systems for categorizing the type and severity of AEs encountered at the dental office. METHODS: Several existing medical AE type and severity classification systems were reviewed and adapted for dentistry. Using data collected in previous work, two initial dental AE type and severity classification systems were developed. Eight independent reviewers performed focused chart reviews, and AEs identified were used to evaluate and modify these newly developed classifications. RESULTS: A total of 958 charts were independently reviewed. Among the reviewed charts, 118 prospective AEs were found and 101 (85.6%) were verified as AEs through a consensus process. At the end of the study, a final AE type classification comprising 12 categories, and an AE severity classification comprising 7 categories emerged. Pain and infection were the most common AE types representing 73% of the cases reviewed (56% and 17%, respectively) and 88% were found to cause temporary, moderate to severe harm to the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events found during the chart review process were successfully classified using the novel dental AE type and severity classifications. Understanding the type of AEs and their severity are important steps if we are to learn from and prevent patient harm in the dental office.

Implementation of a Parent-centered Approach to the Preinduction Checklist in Pediatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The preinduction checklist, part of the three-phase surgical safety checklist, is performed before induction of anesthesia. Our previous research demonstrated higher checklist adherence by perioperative staff when parents were engaged in the preinduction checklist. We hypothesized that use of a parent-centered script (PCS) during the preinduction checklist would increase parent engagement and checklist adherence. METHODS: A single-center, prospective, observational study was conducted in which parents of children (<18 y) undergoing nonemergent surgeries (June 2018-July 2019) were observed before and after PCS implementation. The PCS, developed by the health care team, engaged parents by directly asking them to contribute information relevant to parent knowledge. Parent engagement was rated using a five-point Likert scale, and adherence was scored for each relevant checkpoint completed. RESULTS: Of 270 checklists, 154 (57%) occurred before and 116 (43%) after PCS implementation. Groups were similar by primary language, patient age, and type of surgery, but more postimplementation children had a prior surgery. The overall parent engagement score did not improve with the PCS (P = 0.8); however, there was an improvement in eye contact by parents. After introduction of the PCS, checklist adherence decreased from a median score of 6 (interquartile range 5-6) to 4 (interquartile range 4-5) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a PCS did not improve parent engagement during the preinduction checklist and an unexpected decline in checklist adherence was observed. Further research, with parent and staff input, is necessary to determine how best to engage parents while ensuring high checklist adherence.

Prophylactic intraabdominal drains do not confer benefit in pediatric perforated appendicitis: Results from a quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Prophylactic, intraabdominal drains have been used to prevent intraabdominal abscess (IAA) after perforated appendicitis. We hypothesized that routine drain placement would reduce the IAA rate in pediatric perforated appendicitis. METHODS: A 27-month quality improvement (QI) initiative was conducted: closed-suction, intraabdominal drains were placed intraoperatively in pediatric (age < 18) perforated appendicitis patients. QI patients were compared to controls admitted during the preceding 8 months and following 4 months. The primary outcome was 30-day IAA rate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy QI patients were compared to 109 controls. There was 100% compliance during 21 of 27 months of the QI initiative; only 7 QI patients did not receive drains. IAA occurred in 20.0% of QI patients and 22.9% of control (p = 0.52). After adjustment, the QI initiative was not associated with reduced odds of IAA (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.48-1.44). Median length of stay was longer in QI patients during the index admission (p = 0.03) and over 30 postoperative days (p = 0.03), but these relationships did not persist after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: A QI initiative investigating prophylactic, intraabdominal drain placement in perforated appendicitis did not reduce the IAA rate. We recommend against routine drain placement in pediatric perforated appendicitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Standardized Discharge Antibiotics May Reduce Readmissions in Pediatric Perforated Appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Based on limited evidence, the American Pediatric Surgical Association recommends 5-7 d of postoperative antibiotics in perforated appendicitis for preventing intra-abdominal abscess (IAA). In 2015, our institutional clinical practice guideline was modified to standardize prescription for 7 additional days of oral antibiotics after discharge. We hypothesized that prescribing oral antibiotics after discharge would be associated with fewer complications in perforated appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of pediatric (younger than 18 y) patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis (August 1, 2012-April 30, 2019). Patients diagnosed with IAA before discharge or with a postoperative length of stay ≥8 d were excluded. Patient outcomes were compared prestandardization and poststandardization of discharge antibiotics. RESULTS: Of 617 patients, 212 (34.5%) were admitted prestandardization and 404 (65.5%) poststandardization. Overall, 409 patients (66.3%) received discharge antibiotics. The median total postoperative antibiotic duration was 4 d (interquartile range, 3-5) prestandardization versus 11 d (interquartile range, 10-12) poststandardization (P < 0.001). Prestandardization patients had a higher rate of IAA (8.9% versus 4.5%, P = 0.03) and were readmitted more frequently (13.1% versus 6.4%, P = 0.005). On adjusted analysis, admission poststandardization was associated with reduced odds of IAA (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.06), but the relationship was imprecise. Admission poststandardization was significantly associated with reduced adjusted odds of readmission (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Prescription for seven additional days of oral antibiotics after discharge was associated with reduced odds of readmission in pediatric perforated appendicitis. This population may benefit from a longer postoperative antibiotic course than currently recommended.

Using a Second Stakeholder-Driven Variance Reporting System Improves Pediatric Perioperative Safety.

Despite recognizing the occurrence of variances, we noted a low rate of reporting with the established computer variance program. Therefore, we developed and introduced a simple, handwritten variance reporting system. The goal of this study was to compare our pediatric perioperative handwritten variance cards to our established computerized variance reporting system. METHODS: We developed a handwritten variance card program through a stakeholder-driven quality-improvement initiative. We collected variances from handwritten cards in 4 perioperative locations and also from the established computerized variance system. We analyzed the variances and categorized them into 6 safety domains and 5 variance categories. RESULTS: Over 6 consecutive years, 3,434 variances were reported (687 computerized and 2,747 handwritten). For safety domains, the computerized system was more likely to capture adverse events and near-misses (8.7% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001; 23.5% vs. 8.6%, P < 0.001, respectively) while the handwritten system was more likely to identify the safety process and other non-safety issues (20.1% vs. 38.3%, P < 0.001). Both systems addressed policy/process issues most often, with 37.9% of the handwritten cards and 66.6% of the computerized variance reports. Of the handwritten cards with a patient identifier (n = 1,407), only 5.1% (n = 72) also had a computerized variance filed about the same event. Thus, staff reported >1,300 additional variances that were not identified with the computerized variance system alone. CONCLUSION: The handwritten, stakeholder-driven variance reporting system was essential to identify local and system issues that would not have been identified by the computerized variance reporting system alone.

Feasibility of Electronic Health Record-Based Triggers in Detecting Dental Adverse Events.

BACKGROUND: We can now quantify and characterize the harm patients suffer in the dental chair by mining data from electronic health records (EHRs). Most dental institutions currently deploy a random audit of charts using locally developed definitions to identify such patient safety incidents. Instead, selection of patient charts using triggers and assessment through calibrated reviewers may more efficiently identify dental adverse events (AEs). OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to develop and test EHR-based triggers at four academic institutions and find dental AEs, defined as moderate or severe physical harm due to dental treatment. METHODS: We used an iterative and consensus-based process to develop 11 EHR-based triggers to identify dental AEs. Two dental experts at each institution independently reviewed a sample of triggered charts using a common AE definition and classification system. An expert panel provided a second level of review to confirm AEs identified by sites reviewers. We calculated the performance of each trigger and identified strategies for improvement. RESULTS: A total of 100 AEs were identified by 10 of the 11 triggers. In 57% of the cases, pain was the most common AE identified, followed by infection and hard tissue damage. Positive predictive value (PPV) for the triggers ranged from 0 to 0.29. The best performing triggers were those developed to identify infections (PPV = 0.29), allergies (PPV = 0.23), failed implants (PPV = 0.21), and nerve injuries (PPV = 0.19). Most AEs (90%) were categorized as temporary moderate-to-severe harm (E2) and the remainder as permanent moderate-to-severe harm (G2). CONCLUSION: EHR-based triggers are a promising approach to unearth AEs among dental patients compared with a manual audit of random charts. Data in dental EHRs appear to be sufficiently structured to allow the use of triggers. Pain was the most common AE type followed by infection and hard tissue damage.